What Saving Mr Banks tells us about the original Mary Poppins

Posted on by no1businessman

Being given a replica of Mary Poppins with the aid of PL Travers for my eighth birthday turned into each a thrill and, because it turned out, one of the best disappointments of my younger existence. A thrill, due to the fact for the last 5 years I had lived and breathed the Disney version, which had pop out in a blaze of glory in 1964. At faculty, I received the unofficial prize for the person that had visible the movie the most times (I stated 8, even though it became honestly most effective six: but within the Disney universe, believing something difficult enough is the important thing to making it come proper). I did, though, really win the competition for who may want to say “supercalifragilisticexpialidocious†backwards. And, at home, I sternly supplied my grandmother with the sheet track of the Sherman Brothers’ score. Like a bad fairy princess bullying her court docket musician, I made Grandma plays on and on till the moment while it appeared that we might each spin ourselves right into a cloud of colored chalk dust of the type that Bert the pavement artist makes use of the cartoon his magical opportunity worlds.

however, the moment I unwrapped my present I knew something had long gone horribly incorrect. My dad and mom had shape whilst it came to missing the factor. Through the years I had been the recipient of endless cover versions of branded toys – knock-off variations of Barbie, Caran d’pain and Ladybird – and this Mary Poppins seemed especially counterfeit too. For a start the duvet turned into a muddy, slightly sinister pink. This, I now assume, was a nod to “strike me crimsonâ€, considered one of Mary Poppins’s favored sayings, or perhaps to the blossom in Cherry Tree Lane. Anyway, red turned into now not then the absolute obsession with little girls that it has on account that emerge as, and i have been hoping for the luscious, bleeding shades of Disney’s Technicolor. however, a ways worse changed into the image of Mary Poppins on the duvet. Drawn by using Mary Shepard, daughter of EH Shepard who illustrated Winnie-the-Pooh, this Mary Poppins regarded not anything like the gentle and adorable Julie Andrews. In reality, she resembled a stiff peg doll, thin and hard, with a peg nose and two spots of excessive colour on her timber cheeks. This turned into the form of nanny, magical or know not, from which any sensible toddler could decrease.
I understand now that this tough-cornered Mary Poppins turned into no longer a few careless slip on Shepard’s part – the e-book preceded the movie via 30 years and, as far as Travers turned into concerned, it turned into Walt Disney who got it incorrect whilst he added spoonfuls of sugar, no longer to mention a few larky caricature penguins, to her actually as an alternative darkish text. It’s far Travers‘s and Disney’s fraught tussles over whose Mary Poppins might finally triumph that is introduced to existence in Saving Mr Banks, the new movie starring Emma Thompson and Tom Hanks.

Anyway, as Travers‘s textual content makes clean, Mary Poppins is no splendor. She has squinty eyes and large ft and regularly attracts the comment from the opposite characters that she is “no longer a great deal to examineâ€. Nor does the unique Mary Poppins sound whatever just like the carefully modulated Julie Andrews. Travers gives her the accent and vocabulary of a real London nanny: cockney base notes overlaid with a strangled gentility. So she says such things as “I’ll have you ever realize that my uncle is a sober, sincere, difficult-working guy!†and punctuates her pronouncements with “an advanced sniffâ€.
As I study further into Travers‘s e-book my suspicion grew that I had been palmed off with inferior items. There has been no Bert here, no longer in reality. He makes a brief look as a matchman and pavement artist, however there’s no trace of the only-guy amusing manufacturing facility this is Dick Van Dyke. Mary Poppins doesn’t arrive from the sky, at least no longer in the first e book (there are six in general) and, maximum discombobulating of all, there aren’t Banks kids but 4: Jane, Michael and toddler twins John and Barbara. Oh, and Mrs Banks did not lark around making a song about suffragettes and Mr Banks in no way were given to fly a kite.

But I ought to have forgiven all these dreadful derelictions – how livid Mr Disney should be! – if the e book wasn’t so oddly stupid. Or possibly that must be dully atypical. There were lengthy, waffly passages in which characters who didn’t appear in the Disney movie went on and on about the celebs, and the wind and the moon and the Grand Chain that connects all creatures. Even the adventures that Mary Poppins undertakes together with her fees had an indeterminate satisfactory, without a right resolution. On the stop of each outing Jane and Michael visit mattress now not sure what has just took place or what it all approach. And the identical changed into proper of eight-yr-antique me. Disgusted, or possibly disturbed, I tucked Mary Poppins directly to the “too difficult†section of my small library and moved on to Paddington undergo. Rooted in a secular geography of Peru, Portobello avenue and marmalade sandwiches, you knew where you were with Paddington.
A huge part of Travers‘s quarrel with Disney changed into that she did not create especially for kids, while that became all he did. One of the first-rate scenes in Saving Mr Banks shows Travers, performed by means of Thompson, overwhelmed with horror to discover that her los angeles hotel room has been filled with soft cuddly toys from the Disney organization’s celluloid bestiary, including Winnie-the-Pooh. Alternatively, Travers saw herself as a mythographer. A follower of Gurdjieff, the Russian mystic who delivered the west to a ragbag of eastern mysticism within the first a part of the 20th century, Travers became extra inquisitive about excavating the archetypes that underpinned esoteric Christianity than dreaming up nursery pap. She constantly made the factor that it became the grownups, now not the kids, who needed Mary Poppins maximum. One of the most critical scenes inside the book worries the child twins John and Barbara Banks who’re capable to speak to the sunlight and the wind and to animals and who swear that they’ll by no means overlook this joyful international of oceanic oneness. However on their first birthday they may be thrown out of paradise, just as Mary Poppins continually stated they could be, and are no longer able to speak with the herbal world. It was to assist all the grownup Johns and Barbaras find their manner back to this region of innocence and style that Mary Poppins first got here to earth.


Rereading the Mary Poppins books today, it is not the cod theology that hits you a lot as their monetary and political underpinning. At the same time as the Disney movie is set on the apogee of empire – “The year is 1910, it’s the age of men†crowed David Tomlinson as Mr Banks – Travers‘s ebook is firmly positioned inside the 1930s, Auden’s “low, cheating decadeâ€. The first lousy surprise of the terrific melancholy might have been over, however there is an experience that not anything can ever be trusted again. On the primary page Travers tells us that No 17 Cherry Tree Lane is the smallest and shabbiest house in the road because Mr Banks has given Mrs Banks the choice between a large circle of relatives or “a nice, easy, comfy residenceâ€. Whilst Banks arrives domestic from work each nighttime he often can not spare any coppers to present to the kids because “the financial institution is damagedâ€. And then there is the vexing commercial enterprise of the servants’ wages which, the increasingly more harassed grasp of the residence announces, are ruining him.

No 17 Cherry Tree Lane is in reality within the midst of what changed into recognized through the interwar period as “the servant problemâ€. With young running-elegance people more and more reluctant to “move into providerâ€, the center lessons were obliged to run their houses with the help of a dwindling cohort of more and more bolshie workforce who were not about to position up with any nonsense from their “bettersâ€. And that, in reality, is the point Travers is making when Mary Poppins turns up from nowhere and refuses to offer references. Hysterically grateful that each person at all is ready to paintings for her, a cowed Mrs Banks right now agrees to waive the formalities.



About the Author