Tech Is Only Effective If Companies Know How To Use It 1

Tech Is Only Effective If Companies Know How To Use It

A lacking “g” is all it took to inspire this column. It left me wondering what the point of probably having the greatest generation is if human beings don’t understand how to use it.

Let me explain. Two days before Christmas — for my nephew’s birthday — we bought him an e-gift card from his favorite restaurant on that they may immediately email to him. I entered his mother’s email account because of the shipping deal. She called me an hour later and said she had not received the e-card. I tested and recognized I’d missed a “g ” within her email deal’s domain call. Completely my fault — I get it. Teaches me for using my cell phone to complete the order without carrying my glasses. No hassle, I determine. I log into our Amazon account and choose the “resend” choice, this time coming into the right email address. It won’t’ undergo. I strive 12 extra times — even coming into my account email address for a replica. I try to refund the purchase and begin from scratch when that fails, but Amazon keeps blocking me. So after looking the website for help- Amazon hides it nicely- my wife found a chat choice.


Amazon’s rep told me he’d cope with the trouble properly there. Ninety minutes later, he admits he and his manager cannot get further along than I did alone. I asked if he could please provide me the Amazon customer service number. He says he can not (what are they defensive there, I’m’ thinking); however, he takes my quantity. Almost immediately, my smartphone rang. It’s a distinctive Amazon consultant, dashing to my help. Long tale short: 45 minutes pass and this rep can get no similar to what I already have. So, I requested to speak together with her supervisor. A few moments later, a supervisor came on the road and told me she would clear up my issue. I pass into an extended clarification of what has been transpiring for a few hours. She tells me now not to worry. Long tale quick: the only way she will treat the situation- and nearly a half-hour later- is by refunding me the present card price on a previous purchase we made on Amazon several weeks ago. You were supposed to be kidding me.

Isn’t Amazon the company that proudly gives smooth returns? Don’t they have more generations than pretty much every other employer around? And they can not even refund a one-hour antique gift card emailed to the incorrect address?

During my 66-minute phone communique with Amazon, I changed into posting irritated tweets about the service I was receiving. I even tagged Amazon founder Jeff Bezos in the one’s tweets. As I write this column, the tweets have already acquired 570 impressions with dozens of retweets and likes. I am now not the most effective one that has long passed through a comparable state of affairs with this corporation. I checked nowadays, and the refund appears to have been credited to our credit scorecard. So, the supervisor probably finished what she set out to do: remedy the state of affairs in some bizarre manner.

But that still leaves me very uncomfortable with how all of this technology that Amazon and others I’ve handled (like while USPS lost a passport) in the past year have. They don’t arm themselves with folks who can honestly grasp the technology. Isn’t that the point of the era, to make existence simpler? It doesn’t’ co-exist with commonplace sense in some locations.

This revel has renewed my intention in this column for 2019: To entirely report on merchandise that nicely uses era — and to bypass or single out the one’s products that don’t make paintings efficaciously proper out of the field. Wish me good fortune.

You want to devour less and exercise more to force your frame to apply saved fats for energy. How much, much less, and what sort of more? Your frame stores fats, because you’re ingesting extra energy than your frame, needs to maintain its contemporary weight. For instance, say you need to eat 2000 energy regularly to preserve your weight; if you accomplish that, you will hold your weight. However, if you eat 2500 calories a day (and do not work out), you may have eaten a further 500 energy, which your body is not using and will consequently be stored as fat. 3500 energy = 1lb of fat.

So, if you consume 500 greater energy every week, you may gain 1lb of fat at the top of the week; it does not sound like a lot; however, it does add up. So, to shed pounds, you want to lessen your calorie intake; a safe, healthful amount is 500, much less.

So again, say you want to devour 2000 energy to keep your weight; you want to lower this number to 1500, ordinary of the week, to lose 1lb. The healthiest technique for this is to consume the 2000 energy, then do sufficient cardio to burn more than 500 calories. Still, youu could cut it by consuming 250 calories less and burning 250 calories doing cardio, something you need, just as long as you have the 500 calorie deficit. ROverweighthumans can shoot for 22 lbs every week, suggesting a calorie deficit of 1000 energy daily.


I am a writer, financial consultant, husband, father, and avid surfer. I am also a long-time entrepreneur, investor, and trader. For almost two decades, I have worked in the financial sector, and now I focus on making money through investing in stock trading.