International Industrial Development Is Leading to World Unification 1

International Industrial Development Is Leading to World Unification

The essence of twenty-first-century competition is competition, inefficient product output, and jockeying for a function to be the primary hyperlink in a worldwide state-directed heavy enterprise chain. Countries with the highest capability to mass produce and distribute complicated infrastructure-associated matters may offer a structure for planetary unification/governance and accumulate popular legitimacy. Duals in relevant capitals of the arena will visit fantastic lengths to have their states be as integral within this spinal twine as possible. This involves creating hyperlinks between those referred countrywide champions” and national commercial sectors in general (and therefore, political units themselves as public sectors increasingly get involved in the long-term planning and funding).

Industrial Development

For example, Mexico City elites may also comprehend that the rapidly growing Mexican business quarter won’t take management in the northern hemisphere via itself. If they combine it sufficiently with Canadian and American sectors, their potential to make influential choices a long way up the spinal cord is dramatically elevated. Their psychological ego force to get higher and higher seats at the collective selection-making desk will drive the countries they manipulate toward the merger.

One may argue that this isn’t any exception from the procedure that occurred for the past four hundred years as various cartels pushed their governments into cooperation/merger, international or supranational alliances, and occasionally into battle over surplus manufacturing. One can also argue that the submit-hegemonic fragmentation right into a multipolar world is likewise a seemingly cyclical common occurrence. However, the contemporary manner of economic and business cartels influencing supranational mergers will take location in an environment that differs from the previous multipolar length of the early twentieth century. That is in view that:

What is obvious is that powerful egos can’t compete with the old ways through violence or in a loose-for-all technologically enabled useful resource depletion. The financial hypothesis has also been validated as inadequate to provide a long-time launch valve for psychological competition. The process of elimination leaves global leaders with an alternatively novel benign (and, as a substitute, tough!) way to compete through manufacturing and welfare technology for the humans they oversee. To assist in visualizing what is needed, what’s occurring, what’s going to happen more and more hold to happen, and what desires to be ingrained in worldwide awareness as needing to appear, think about this example:

[There are five continents in the world with multiple countries each. Four of these continents have at least two strong industrial countries with industrial monopolies that are cozy with their respective governments. Elites of 3-4 continents (North and South American companies may merge on this one) decide to create supranational “Japans on steroids” for each heavy industry. With state aid and coordination, a beefed-up equivalent to the European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS) is created on each continent for energy, high-speed rail transport, bridge/tunnel equipment, air/space transport, modular housing, and a few others related to resource extraction to feed the new “continental champions”.]

To create those continental champions, a greatgreateruantity of nanationalapitalism and nanationalnvestment/management is required. This is made palatable to taxpayers by sharing half or greater of the income with government treasuries as Gazprom does. This rapidly builds on, combines, and goes in addition to the European Coal and Steel Community, Euratom, EADS, Gazprom, and others.

The predominant goal isn’t always most effective in hastily streamlining and taking advantage of economies of scale in the heavy business manufacturing of energy plant life, massive energy-strength flower parts, trains, planes, modular housing, and resource extraction/recycling. The foremost aim is to turn each continent into a supranational manufacturing unit, making 5-6 wide categories of factors to prevent global social unrest AND maintain competition, evolution, and variety of products within the international enterprise.

The beauty of this process is that each u. S. A. Can increase or lower the level of country possession/(macro socialism or state capitalism, however, you’d like to name it) because it sees fit while preserving the USA within the business chain. Being a part of the chain additionally creates incentives to enhance technological, infrastructural, and social development in all spheres to stay part of an embedded chain. The incentives to make holistic improvements are greater than those pushed by a neoliberal emphasis on reform, considering that fulfillment and failure are more apparent. The public can, without problems, tell if the United States doesn’t have what it takes to design and cost-effectively construct a big part of a subsequent technology transatlantic hypersonic heavy passenger aircraft. To capture up and enter the chain, the production abilities of army commercial complexes should be transformed to civilian use when feasible and applied to the most.

Additional positives of this association are that loads of extra capital in-depth experimentation can now be allowed due to the pulling of resources and supranational taxpayer ensures. Macro-Gazprom-type builds in manufacturing inefficiencies are more than compensated by creating the latest generations of hypersonic aircraft, mass manufacturing of MagLev delivery and passenger teach wagons, fission reactors, etc.

There is likewise an Orwellian twist to this new global competition (even though a nice one). The six continents are moving into a triangular macro competition wherein not even two beefed-up EADS-type superb agencies can ever hope to win fully. Let’s be extra apparent. Say there may be Oceania Rail, Eurasia Rail, and EastAsia Rail all developing more recent, better, and differentiated MagLev teach merchandise (starting from magnetic heavy loader manufacturing unit chain carts to metropolis subway cars to the transcontinental passenger, and so forth). Triangular competition like this tends to provide simultaneous product launches through all three entities. This has been determined in products from flat display TVs to subsequent era combat airplanes. We see the first seeds of what will return in the Boeing and Airbus rivalry with China working on its exquisite, heavy transcontinental passenger aircraft.

If triangular opposition reaches the total planetary scale, the value of the new merchandise, time to lead them to, and time between each successive product technology falls. Yes, continents might be packed with monopolies fused into supranational continental monopolies, but it’s far too small a charge to pay for macro-degree technological progress. New experimental continent-scale protectionist rules and opposition over guiding/exploiting the improvement of the African Union have to save any two supranational factories from overcoming the triangular arrangement. Tripolar global is dramatically more dynamic as elites inside every commercial cluster usually want to be focused on preventing indirect strategic collusion between two rivals while working and competing with every rival circuitously as nicely. Anybody who performed three-way chess is aware of this. Some tasks, like the operation of a project to Mars, may require occasional business unipolarity; however, for the maximum element, the defined tripolar arrangement has enough economies of scale to benefit humanity.


I am a writer, financial consultant, husband, father, and avid surfer. I am also a long-time entrepreneur, investor, and trader. For almost two decades, I have worked in the financial sector, and now I focus on making money through investing in stock trading.